The Brave New World of Open Innovation

Many leading companies are now adopting open innovation (OI) as a way to drive their new product development.  Companies such as Proctor and Gamble, IBM, LG Electronics, Kraft Foods, Reckitt Benckiser, Unilever and Kimberly-Clark are all enthusiastic advocates of this approach.  So what does it entail?  Open innovation replaces the vertical integration of innovation processes within one company with a network of collaborators working on innovation projects.  The term was coined by Professor Henry Chesbrough who described it thus, ‘Open Innovation is a paradigm that assumes that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas and internal and external paths to market, to advance their technology.’  Using outsiders can speed up processes, reduce costs, introduce more innovative ideas and reduce time to market.  One of the examples that Chesbrough uses is the Hollywood Film Industry which has innovated for decades with a range of partnerships and alliances between studios, directors, actors, writers, agencies, independent product companies and specialist supplier.  These concepts which helped create so many films are now being applied to mainstream product areas.

Crowdsourcing is one particular manifestation of OI.  It is the act of outsourcing a task to a large group of people outside your organisation, often by making a public call for response.  It is based on the open source philosophy which used a large ‘crowd’ of developers to build the Linux operating system.

Proctor and Gamble aims to source 50% of its innovations from outside using open innovation.   Early results included new products such as Mr. Clean Magic Eraser and Pringles Prints.  Kimberly-Clark reduced the time is takes to bring out new products by 30% through open innovation.  It launched Sunsignals in just six months by collaborating with a smaller company, SunHealth Solutions.  Sunsignals is a self-adhesive sensor that changes colour when the wearer is in danger of burning in the sun. Kimberly-Clark partners with over 30 companies including joint-development, joint ventures, co-distribution, and licensing deals.

In the book, A Guide to Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing, Jeffreys Phillips of OVO Innovation categorises four different types of Open Innovation model.  They are as follows:

  1. Suggestive/Participative.  Here a company will encourage anyone to submit an idea and to review and rank ideas from others.  A good example of this Dell’s Ideastorm.  This is a website that invites suggestions for Dell’s products or services.  It has received over 15000 suggestions and Dell says that 400 have been implemented.  Note that anyone can submit an idea on any topic.  This model will potentially generate a large number of ideas in all sorts of areas which makes evaluation and selection difficult.
  2. Suggestive/Invitational.  In this model the sponsor company invites specific individuals, teams or companies to contribute ideas on very broad topic areas.  This is what IBM does with its Idea Jams.  These are often campaign or event driven and the invitation is limited to a restricted time.  IBM receives many thousands of ideas from these campaigns.
  3. Directed/Invitational.  The company invites specific individuals or partners to respond to specific challenges or requests.  This is the most popular model and it is the one used by Proctor and Gamble in its Connect and Develop programme and by Innocentive which invites solutions for tough scientific problems.  With this model you get far fewer suggestions but they tend to be of much higher value and focus.
  4. Directed/Participative.  Anyone can submit suggestions for very specific challenges.  When the 2010 Deep Water Horizon oil disaster occurred in the Gulf of Mexico BP and the US Government used a website to invite anyone to suggest ways to cap the leak or recover the oil spills.  This method can generate a large number of ideas for a particular campaign or issue.

In choosing which approach to adopt it is important to first define your strategy and identify what you want to get out of OI.  What is your vision and what is the business strategy to achieve it?  How can OI contribute to these objectives?

OI needs executive level commitment if it is to succeed.  It cannot be delegated to R&D as a project.  It requires a fundamental change in the corporate mind-set and this is generally the first and most important obstacle that companies face in trying to adopt OI.  Most corporations have a tradition of jealously guarding their intellectual property and of rejecting unorthodox external ideas.  OI depends on an attitude of trust, openness and sharing. It requires company-wide buy-in and this can only be attained with the full commitment of the CEO and senior team. 

Most companies are difficult to approach and middle managers can often see outsiders as a distraction or source of trouble.  So a change in attitude is needed.  You have to select a number of people who are both ambassadors and intrapreneurs.  They provide the link to the outside.

OI requires new systems and processes to handle the volume of response in a timely fashion.  It also requires new business practices in terms of licensing, disclosure and the sharing intellectual property.  Once you have identified partners to work with an innovation project you need to consider these steps.

  1. Each party should define what it wants to get out of the relationship.
  2. Who owns the intellectual property in the partnership must be clear.
  3. Each side should allocate a senior person with overall responsibility for the success of the partnership.
  4. Key obligations, expectations and milestones should be established early.
  5. Honesty and trust is built on clear communication – especially when objectives look likely to be missed.
  6. Get a good legal contract.

OI and crowdsourcing hold out the prospect of transforming and accelerating new product development.  These concepts have been proven to work by major players.  However, they require a change in the corporate mindset, culture and processes.  They require top level commitment.  Fortunately there is enough shared experience and written guidance to help the newcomer to enter this brave new world.

What do you think?

Paul Sloane writes and speaks on leadership and innovation.  He is the editor of A Guide to Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing  published by Kogan-Page and a partner of PDMA's Conference on Social Product Development & Co-Creation, June 27-28 in AZ.

For more information, visit www.destination-innovation.com

Comments

They are visionary leaders

They are visionary leaders are very focused in their approach that they might be too boring cocktail party? However, by sharing their vision and their enthusiasm for their vision to employees and business partners, enabling their companies to innovate. However, the changes are committed to achieving exceptional strategic, rather than change for change.

Innovation is the creation of

Innovation is the creation of more efficient or more effective products, processes, services, technologies, or ideas that are accepted by the market, government and society. Innovation differs from invention to innovation which refers to the use of new ideas or methods, while the present invention refers more directly to generating ideas or methods of itself.    

These kind of post is always

These kind of post is always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post. Happy to see your blog as it is just what I’ve looking for and excited to read all the posts. I am looking forward to another great article from you.

Open innovation, or

Open innovation, or partnerships for outside sources of new technology and market access, has become one of the most talked about innovation movement. There are over half a million Google citations for open innovation, and Amazon.com lists no fewer than 4,500 books referencing the subject ..

In a world where knowledge

In a world where knowledge spillovers, Open Innovation, says that the information you are outside the company can profitably leverage when combined core competencies. According to Henry Chesbrough's book with the same name, open innovation "is a paradigm, which requires that companies can and should use external ideas.  

 The central idea behind open

 The central idea behind open innovation is that in a world of knowledge spread, companies can not afford to rely solely on their own research, but should instead buy or license processes or inventions (patents) from other companies.     

Open innovation, or

Open innovation, or partnerships for outside sources of new technology and market access, has become one of the most discussed the movement to change. There are over half a million Google citations for open innovation, and Amazon.com lists no fewer than 4,500 subject reference books.

Despite the obvious

Despite the obvious advantages of open innovation inside out, you should not underestimate the diffi culty to develop a program to do this. There is the challenge of cultural, political, and organizational inevitable in the face. For example, internal and external channels will compete for the fruits of R & D, and will have to manage tensions..Regards,

it is a great thought yes

it is a great thought yes this culminates in lower innovation costs, accelerated time-to-market and improved innovation success rates. Thanks for sharing... 

If some of those large

If some of those large companies that you mention have taken to implementing Open Innovation for their product development then certainly it must have some merit. It will be interesting to see how popular this becomes. 

interesting ideas

interesting ideas

The Idea of Open Innovation

The Idea of Open Innovation is wonderful since we can save our time when it comes for execution business plan without having worry for big cost for implementation. John -

IBM receives many thousands

IBM receives many thousands of ideas from these campaigns. Your blog really brought some things to light that I never would have thought about before reading it.

Paul - I am interested in

Paul - I am interested in learning more about the new types of remuneration models corporate firms are adopting to support their open-innovation activities within professional creative communities. An estimated 80% of all innovation is not subject to patent and early-stage product, service and digital developments/concepts are not often formerly protected, other than direct replication of aesthetics) under IP law (software, business models, new digital platforms and so forth). Therefore in order for corporates to view early stage developments from professional sources, where most often signing NDA's with 100's of participants is not feasible - what other methodologies are you aware of that are being utilised?In that regard, I would also be interested in your view of www.creativebarcode.com - the world's first open-protection system to under-pin open innovation between professional innovation and solution-led creative industries and industry at large. Is it the only one to date? Are there other models?